Projet Montreal’s Top 10 Reasons Why The New Turcot Plan Still Sucks!

Ok, they didn’t say it sucks, but while there are more, this list of 10 reasons why the MTQ’s “new” Turcot plan does suck are pretty good ones. And do keep in mind that a) They added 1.5 Billion dollars to your price tag just to add some good greenwashed layers, a sort of “pretty in pink” version of a freeway interchange, and b) Jean Charest has still not called a public inquiry into corruption in the Quebec construction industry. If you think the two are not connected please write me from whatever planet you are on and let me know why.

And here they are!

1) A concept out of step with the challenges of the 21st Century

In functional terms, the province’s Turcot plan simply retraces the original interchange. Only the construction technique is different. The Quebec transport ministry has effectively carbon-copied the 1960 concept, including its idea of modernity and progress. In so doing, the ministry avoids the fundamental question: how does this outdated structure fit into an urban vision that extends to 2050 and beyond?

2) No investment in public transport

The transport ministry ignored the city’s proposal to balance its overall investment by installing a cutting-edge electric transit system. This modern tram would have linked Lachine and Lasalle to downtown and served as the spine of a new Quartier de la Falaise, along the St. Jacques escarpment. As the three Laval metro stations have shown, investing in effective, attractive systems is a must-have to accomplish any meaningful shift from private vehicles to public transportation.Instead, the ministry has offered 1 reserved bus lane in each direction on the future Highway 20 (A-20). From the start, this proposal is barely credible, since the lanes would only run along the 3 km of the Turcot yard: what use will such a short segment be? Furthermore, the province is not known for keeping its promises where reserved lanes are concerned. For example, the A-25 bridge, supposedly built with the best intentions for public transit, included no such lanes on completion.

3) Increased traffic capacity

The Quebec Transport Ministry says its project will not increase the vehicle capacity of the east-west axis (A-20 and A-720). This claim is false. In effect, the plan’s proposal to reconfigure interchange curves, add shoulders and widen access ramps will increase the paved surface by 40-50%, something that, at any rate, translates into greater traffic capacity.

4) Hundreds of millions wasted to move Highway 20 to the north side of the Turcot Yard

Currently, Autoroute 20 and the CN railroad tracks lie to the south of the Turcot yard, along Notre-Dame and parallel to the industrial zones lining both sides of the Lachine Canal. The provincial Transport Ministry has chosen to move the highway and the tracks to the north side of the yard, contrary to the city’s April proposal. The municipal proposal would have saved hundreds of millions of dollars, funds that could have been invested in a high-quality public transport system linking Lachine, Lasalle and downtown via the Turcot yard.

5) Turning a hillside park into a dead zone

In moving the A-20 from the Lachine Canal to the foot of the St-Jacques escarpment, the ministry will totally cut off the area. The province’s plan includes provision for a pleasant park at the foot of the hill, complete with bike path. Unfortunately, the only way to access this park would be via a footbridge crossing over the highway and tracks. Few cyclists would do it, put off by the difficulty of access and potential safety problems. What is more likely to happen is that this isolated area will become a destination for the homeless, and a no-go area for other potential users.

6) A canal district that will never see the light of day

One of the most promising elements of the City of Montreal’s proposal was the creation of a 70-hectare Quartier de la Falaise at the foot of the St Jacques escarpment. This Quartier could accommodate up to 8,000 homes or 15,000 residents, as well as 3-4 million square feet of office, retail, service and other community space. These buildings would represent an investment of some $3.5 billion. This green and pleasant neighbourhood, built along the tram line linking Lachine and downtown, would help halt the exodus of Montreal families to the suburbs.

The province’s decision to move the A-2o and the tracks to the foot of the cliff effectively kills the Quartier concept; instead, the Ministry is proposing a Quartier du canal. In so doing, they seem to have forgotten that the Lachine canal is here lined on both sides by industrial facilities, including the huge Kruger paper plant. The plan also ignores the fact that the City of Montreal is set to authorize the construction of a bio-methane plant on the canal’s south bank, and that this type of industry must be at least 400 metres from any habitation. So… a neighbourhood flanked by a highway, a string of factories, and a bio-methane plant: how delightful! Realizing how unrealistic–and unappetizing– this image is, the Ministry solves the problem by simply making the industries bordering the canal vanish.

7) Questionable cost estimates

Despite having worked on this project for years, the Quebec transport ministry seems to have great difficulty determining the cost of its project. Throughout the last year, its estimates swung between $1.5 billion one day, $2.6 billion the next, $2.1 billion after that, and finally the $3 billion announced today. However, this apparent difficulty in establishing the cost of its plan did not prevent the Ministry from appraising, overnight, the city’s April proposal at $6 billion – a ridiculous figure that has nevertheless made an indelible and unfortunate impression on the minds of Montrealers.

8:) Expropriations

The transport ministry plan will require the expropriation of 106 residences in four buildings: 100 at 780 St. Rémy, and two each in three other buildings. Hard to believe that in this day and age, we are still tearing down houses to make way for highways! Transport Minister Sam Hamad and Mayor Gérald Tremblay are clearly not considering the gravity of their mistake in trying to evict the residents of 780 St. Rémy.

9) Again with the (road) berms

The latest draft of the Turcot project still includes berms at least 20 feet high, which will shut the populations of Côte-Saint-Paul and Saint-Henri from the rest of the city. While the city’s proposal would invigorate and reconnect the neighbourhoods surrounding the interchange, the province’s raised roadways will perpetuate the urban fragmentation created by the original Turcot Interchange.

10) An attractive entry to the city? Maybe some other time…

In line with the city’s April proposal, the Transport Ministry intends to create an attractive entrance to the city. However, the current draft of the plan – as well as the continued presence of the giant billboards lining the highway – means there’s little chance this welcoming entry will come to pass.

To this day, only the Plateau Mt-Royal administration, run by Projet Montréal, has dared take on this indescribable visual pollution.

This page.

About these ads

2 responses to “Projet Montreal’s Top 10 Reasons Why The New Turcot Plan Still Sucks!

  1. Maybe the MTQ transport planners could still back down in favour of Montreal’s original proposal. At least in terms of the extension of Highway 20 on the wrong side of the Lachine Canal.

    Projet Montreal needs marketers to give their ideas more oomff, more branding appeal. Especially that idea of 30-odd acres of housing at the bottom of the escarpment.

    Why not make that new residencial ‘acreage’ a retirement community for folks who were kids when Goose Village was destroyed (or rent subsidize a few ancestors of the Griffintown workers)?

    Name the place something with very good vibes like Villa Goose Village (VGV). Put a Joe Beef Pharmacy in the centre. For a real vista, instead of balconies, everybody could have a deck on the third story roof so they could sit back on a recycled rubber bench and watch the traffic go by. Heaven, eh!?

    I don’t know how the grandkids will get there for visits. Maybe on a rope ladder from the back of a bowling alley’s parking lot.

  2. Thanks for the laugh, White Fang.

    I agree, the thought of housing at Turcot is kind of off the wall, even self contradicting, unless you are just planning to remove the interchange and let the 20 become one of them there urban boulevards that gets talked about on them futuristic 21st century sci fi shows, um, wait, we are in the 21st century, ain’t we? Nevermind.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s